Product workflow

One Product-Version record for the evidence behind a release.

CRA Ledger connects product identity, SBOM scope, findings review, human decisions, remediation context, release sign-off, retained evidence, and CRA reporting records in one operating workflow.

Operating model

Product Version is the anchor, not an afterthought.

Start with the release you need to understand. Everything else is connected to its evidence scope, review state, decision and remediation history, and release context.

01

Product Version

Release identity and lifecycle scope

02

SBOM

Linked source and primary artifact

03

Findings

Component and vulnerability context

04

Human Review

Rationale, owner, and disposition

05

Decision

Recorded rationale, owner, and disposition

06

Remediation

Treatment work, accepted-risk context, owner, and supporting evidence

07

Evidence Pack

Retained, versioned decision and sign-off record

Version-specific scope Human ownership Retained output

What stays connected

A focused workflow for teams that need the evidence trail to hold together.

The product is organized around the decisions teams already make during release and vulnerability review, not around a catalogue of disconnected compliance features.

Product identity and scope

Start with the release or Product Version that the evidence describes, then link the relevant SBOMs and supporting context.

Findings and human review

Keep vulnerability findings, rationale, ownership, dispositions, and timestamps connected to the release under review.

Decisions and remediation context

Record remediation work, accepted-risk context, ownership, and supporting evidence in the Product-Version record before producing retained evidence output.

History and governance

Preserve review history, role-aware ownership, audit activity, and tenant-scoped records for later review.

Evidence Pack

Retain the evidence state behind a release decision.

Generate a retained Product-Version Evidence Pack after review and sign-off. Earlier pack versions remain available so teams can understand what was captured at each point in time.

The pack supports reviewability, release discussions, and evidence continuity. It does not certify compliance or replace formal assessment.

See security and trust principles

CRA Reporting connection

Reporting records stay connected to product evidence, while judgment stays human.

CRA Ledger helps teams organize CRA Article 14 reporting records around the Product Version. Record awareness timestamps, reportability decisions, milestone state, external references, corrective-measure availability, and close/reopen history. Known exploited vulnerability signals and recorded severe security incidents can flag affected Product Versions for Needs assessment and human CRA Reporting review. CRA Ledger can match CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) signals only against vulnerability findings already associated with Product Versions.

CRA Ledger records the workflow. It does not determine legal reportability, submit reports to authorities, or replace legal and compliance judgment.
1

Security event / vulnerability

Start from a Product Version and source context

2

Awareness timestamp

Record when the team became aware

3

Human determination

Record reportable, not reportable, or needs review

4

Reporting milestones

Track required deadlines and milestone state

5

External submission record

Retain references and submission timestamps

6

Corrective measure

Record when a corrective measure is available

7

Close / reopen history

Preserve the reason and decision trail

Current product proof

Operational visibility for teams running the workflow.

Use the operations console to see risk posture, review progress, findings, alerts, and operational health while Product-Version records hold the release-specific evidence.

CRA Ledger operations console showing risk posture, review progress, findings, and open alerts

Current product proof

Operations console preview

Governance

Designed for controlled review, not black-box compliance claims.

Tenant boundaries, role-aware access, audit activity, retained outputs, and explicit human ownership are part of the operating model.

Tenant-scoped records
Role-based review controls
Audit and decision history

Next step

See one Product Version move from SBOM to retained evidence.

Bring a real workflow question or a controlled sample scope. We will show the evidence record, review flow, and reporting connection.